Cowlitz Court Upholds Murder Conviction

Legacy automated check: the original source text was not preserved. These earlier verdicts have not passed the current publication checks and may contain errors. Source: original document ↗

• ✓
  The Washington Supreme Court denied review of Adam Diggins' convictions“This month the Washington Supreme Court denied review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Adam Diggins’ convictions for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, Felony Harassment, Cyberstalking, and Use of Drug Paraphernalia.”
• ✓
  Adam Diggins was convicted for Attempted Murder in the First Degree“This month the Washington Supreme Court denied review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Adam Diggins’ convictions for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, Felony Harassment, Cyberstalking, and Use of Drug Paraphernalia.”
• ✓
  Adam Diggins was convicted for Felony Harassment“This month the Washington Supreme Court denied review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Adam Diggins’ convictions for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, Felony Harassment, Cyberstalking, and Use of Drug Paraphernalia.”
• ✓
  Adam Diggins was convicted for Cyberstalking“This month the Washington Supreme Court denied review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Adam Diggins’ convictions for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, Felony Harassment, Cyberstalking, and Use of Drug Paraphernalia.”
• ✓
  Adam Diggins was convicted for Use of Drug Paraphernalia“This month the Washington Supreme Court denied review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Adam Diggins’ convictions for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, Felony Harassment, Cyberstalking, and Use of Drug Paraphernalia.”
• ⚠
  Diggins was convicted after a trialNo usable supporting receipt — unverified.
• ✓
  The Court of Appeals upheld the verdict“This month the Washington Supreme Court denied review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Adam Diggins’ convictions for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, Felony Harassment, Cyberstalking, and Use of Drug Paraphernalia.”
• ✓
  The state Supreme Court declined to hear the case“This month the Washington Supreme Court denied review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Adam Diggins’ convictions for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, Felony Harassment, Cyberstalking, and Use of Drug Paraphernalia.”
• ⚠
  The ruling means Diggins' sentence standsNo usable supporting receipt — unverified.
• ⚠
  Diggins will serve time for the offensesNo usable supporting receipt — unverified.
• ⚠
  The offenses included targeting a victim through cyberstalkingNo usable supporting receipt — unverified.
• ⚠
  The offenses included using drug paraphernalia in connection with the attempted murderNo usable supporting receipt — unverified.
• ✓
  The case was handled by Cowlitz County Superior Court“On September 2, 2026, after a two-day trial, a Cowlitz County Superior Court jury found Stacy Estes guilty of Forgery, two counts of Theft in the First Degree, and two counts of Criminal Impersonation in the First Degree.”
• ✓
  The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction“This month the Washington Supreme Court denied review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Adam Diggins’ convictions for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, Felony Harassment, Cyberstalking, and Use of Drug Paraphernalia.”
• ✓
  The state Supreme Court denied further review“This month the Washington Supreme Court denied review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming Adam Diggins’ convictions for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, Felony Harassment, Cyberstalking, and Use of Drug Paraphernalia.”